In February of 2016, the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County issued its opinion in Dietrick v. Fulciniti, PICS Case No. 16-0370 (C.P. Northampton Feb. 18, 2016) Murray, J. In that opinion the court found that an exchange of text messages was sufficient to evidence a contract for construction renovation. The Court held that even though the text messages were not signed, the fact that both parties exchanges messages manifested an agreement, and that the contractor included a payment schedule, which demonstrated a sufficient meeting of the minds.
Initially, defendant filed preliminary objections to plaintiff’s complaint for failure to comply with Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1019(i) which requires that when any claim is based upon a writing the pleader shall attach a copy of the writing to the complaint. Plaintiff subsequently amended its complaint to attach copies of various text messages between plaintiff and defendant. Defendant again filed preliminary objections asserting that the text messages, which were unsigned, were not sufficient to evidence a contract. The Court overruled defendant’s preliminary objections, finding that enough information was contained in the text messages to constitute a written contract and that such information was sufficient to place defendant on notice of the nature of plaintiff’s claims.