Has "the most significant unresolved legal issue in trademark licensing" finally found some closure? Circuit courts have long been split over whether bankrupt trademark owners could revoke a license and on what the effect is, generally, of a rejection of an executory contract. On Monday May 20th, 2019 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that defunct brand owners (as debtors in Chapter 11) cannot use bankruptcy law to unilaterally revoke (reject) a trademark license agreement. The court held that bankruptcy "rejection" of an executory contract trademark license (a contract that neither party has finished performing) under Section 365 was akin to a breach of contract outside of bankruptcy. Per Justice Kagan: "A rejection (of any executory contract) breaches a contract but does not rescind it." The licensee should not lose its right to use the debtor's trademark under license. [Kagan] "Such an act cannot rescind rights that the contract previously granted." Read here for the entire SCOTUS decision in Mission Product Holdings, Inc. vs. Tempnology, LLC.
Posts tagged "SCOTUS decisions"
Subscribe To This Blog's Feed
- Pennsylvania Federal Court Recognizes "Constructive Demotion" as a Type of Adverse Employment Action
- Tincher Opinion Has Residual Effects on Pennsylvania Products Liability Law in the recent Urbieta Case.
- Pennsylvania Products Liability Law: Amazon May be Liable for Defective "Marketplace" Items in Oberdorf Case
- Does a Well Passing Horizontally Under A Property Trigger A "Payment in Lieu of Free Gas" Clause? The Pennsylvania Superior Court Says "No".