In its recent decision in Hillman v. Maretta, the U.S. Supreme Court considered whether a state law providing for the automatic revocation of a beneficiary designation in the event of divorce was preempted by a federal law providing for the enforcement of a beneficiary designation under a federal life insurance policy. 133 S. Ct. 1943, 1945 (June 3, 2013). Specifically, the Virginia state law at issue provided that a former spouse who recovers "death benefits" in violation of the statute was personally liable to the person to whom the benefits should have been paid. Id. at 1948. In effect, the Virginia law redirected to whom the benefits should be paid without regard to insured's beneficiary designation.
Posts tagged "U.S. Supreme Court"
Subscribe To This Blog's Feed
- Employer Awareness of Implicit Gender Bias in the Workplace
- When it Comes to Retaliation, Timing Isn't Everything - Third Circuit Reinforces that Temporal Proximity Must be Considered with Other Evidence of Causation
- Are You Prepared for a Religious Accommodation Request? Third Circuit Finds Employer's Approach Proper
- Supreme Court of PA Holds That an Increase in UIM Coverage Requires Auto Insurers to Offer Opportunity to Waive Stacking