Has "the most significant unresolved legal issue in trademark licensing" finally found some closure? Circuit courts have long been split over whether bankrupt trademark owners could revoke a license and on what the effect is, generally, of a rejection of an executory contract. On Monday May 20th, 2019 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that defunct brand owners (as debtors in Chapter 11) cannot use bankruptcy law to unilaterally revoke (reject) a trademark license agreement. The court held that bankruptcy "rejection" of an executory contract trademark license (a contract that neither party has finished performing) under Section 365 was akin to a breach of contract outside of bankruptcy. Per Justice Kagan: "A rejection (of any executory contract) breaches a contract but does not rescind it." The licensee should not lose its right to use the debtor's trademark under license. [Kagan] "Such an act cannot rescind rights that the contract previously granted." Read here for the entire SCOTUS decision in Mission Product Holdings, Inc. vs. Tempnology, LLC.
Posts tagged "trademark licensing"
Subscribe To This Blog's Feed
- Supreme Court of PA Holds That an Increase in UIM Coverage Requires Auto Insurers to Offer Opportunity to Waive Stacking
- Are Your Employment Policies Ambiguous? Third Circuit Case is a Reminder of the Value of Clear Wording
- Third Circuit Takes a Deep Dive Into the "Four Corners" Rule and Whether Faulty Work Constitutes an "Occurrence" in Sapa Extrusions, Inc. v Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.
- Uncharted Territory of Medical Marijuana and Employment Law in Pennsylvania Demonstrated by Police Officer's Administrative Leave